+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT OSS 120B vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini leads with 30.9% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (88.6%), ARC-C (83.7%), BoolQ (81.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:19.6%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:50.5%(+30.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
5 providers
DeepInfra
Groq
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Novita
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:19.6%
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:50.5%(+30.9%)
Providers:0