+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT OSS 120B vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 20.8% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B offers 126.0K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
10 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.45
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.24 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:90.0%(+20.8%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:69.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
5 providers
DeepInfra
Groq
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Novita
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:90.0%(+20.8%)
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:69.2%
Providers:1