+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT OSS 120B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 31.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B offers 122.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 72B was developed as the flagship text model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced language capabilities with 72 billion parameters. Built to compete with frontier models in reasoning, coding, and general language tasks, it represents Qwen's most capable instruction-following model in this generation.
10 months newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.45($0.21 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:80.1%(+31.1%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Average Score:49.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
5 providers
DeepInfra
Groq
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Novita
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:80.1%(+31.1%)
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Avg Score:49.0%
Providers:4