+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT OSS 20B vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
MedGemma 4B IT leads with 3.1% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 20B is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (85.3%), CodeForces (83.9%), GPQA (71.5%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
GPT OSS 20B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Average Score:26.1%
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:29.3%(+3.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
4 providers
Groq
Throughput: 1000 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms
Novita
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 1000 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Avg Score:26.1%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:29.3%(+3.1%)
Providers:0