+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT OSS 20B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 20B leads with 17.3% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 20B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. GPT OSS 20B is available on 4 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 20B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 20B was created as a smaller open-source variant, designed to balance capability with accessibility for researchers and developers. Built with 20 billion parameters, it provides a more approachable entry point for those seeking to work with open-source language models while benefiting from OpenAI's architectural insights.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
GPT OSS 20B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.20($0.05 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Average Score:85.3%(+17.3%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
4 providers
Groq
Throughput: 1000 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms
Novita
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 1000 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Avg Score:85.3%(+17.3%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2