+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 7.6% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base was developed by IBM as an enterprise-focused foundation model, designed to provide a reliable starting point for business applications. Built with 8 billion parameters and trained on curated data, it serves as a foundation for domain-specific customization in enterprise contexts.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
6 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:65.7%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:73.4%(+7.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:65.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:73.4%(+7.6%)
Providers:1