+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 9.3% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base was developed by IBM as an enterprise-focused foundation model, designed to provide a reliable starting point for business applications. Built with 8 billion parameters and trained on curated data, it serves as a foundation for domain-specific customization in enterprise contexts.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
4 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:77.3%(+9.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:77.3%(+9.3%)
Providers:1