+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base leads with 15.8% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Granite 3.3 8B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base is a multimodal language model developed by IBM. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 20 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (89.7%), AttaQ (88.5%), HumanEval+ (86.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:47.6%(+15.8%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:31.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:47.6%(+15.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:31.8%
Providers:1