+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base leads with 49.2% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Granite 3.3 8B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base is a multimodal language model developed by IBM. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 20 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (89.7%), AttaQ (88.5%), HumanEval+ (86.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.0% across 3 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.6%), AIME (57.5%), GPQA (52.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
14 days newer
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:58.4%(+49.2%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:9.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:58.4%(+49.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:9.3%
Providers:0