+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning leads with 25.6% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base was developed by IBM as an enterprise-focused foundation model, designed to provide a reliable starting point for business applications. Built with 8 billion parameters and trained on curated data, it serves as a foundation for domain-specific customization in enterprise contexts.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
14 days newer
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:69.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:94.6%(+25.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:69.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:94.6%(+25.6%)
Providers:0