+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Granite 3.3 8B Base vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 6.3% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base was developed by IBM as an enterprise-focused foundation model, designed to provide a reliable starting point for business applications. Built with 8 billion parameters and trained on curated data, it serves as a foundation for domain-specific customization in enterprise contexts.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
14 days newer
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:74.9%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:81.2%(+6.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:74.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:81.2%(+6.3%)
Providers:0