+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads with 27.9% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by IBM. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (89.7%), AttaQ (88.5%), HumanEval+ (86.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 days newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
2025-04-16
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Average Score:54.3%(+27.9%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:26.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2024-04-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Avg Score:54.3%(+27.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:26.4%
Providers:0