+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning leads with 25.6% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the Granite base model, designed to follow instructions reliably in enterprise settings. Built to serve business applications requiring dependable language understanding, it provides IBM's accessible interface for enterprise AI.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
14 days newer
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
2025-04-16
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Average Score:69.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:94.6%(+25.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2024-04-01
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Avg Score:69.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:94.6%(+25.6%)
Providers:0