+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads with 48.3% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by IBM. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (89.7%), AttaQ (88.5%), HumanEval+ (86.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.0% across 3 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.6%), AIME (57.5%), GPQA (52.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
14 days newer
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
2025-04-16
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Average Score:61.1%(+48.3%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:12.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2024-04-01
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Avg Score:61.1%(+48.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:12.8%
Providers:0