+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads with 7.2% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by IBM. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (89.7%), AttaQ (88.5%), HumanEval+ (86.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
14 days newer
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
2025-04-16
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Average Score:46.5%(+7.2%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:39.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2024-04-01
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Avg Score:46.5%(+7.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:39.4%
Providers:0