+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Jamba 1.5 Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large leads with 19.2% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Large is available on 2 providers. Overall, Jamba 1.5 Large is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large was developed by AI21 Labs using a hybrid architecture combining transformer and state space models, designed to provide efficient long-context understanding. Built to handle extended documents and conversations with computational efficiency, it represents AI21's innovation in efficient large-scale model design.
8 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:53.8%
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:73.0%(+19.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:53.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:73.0%(+19.2%)
Providers:2