+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 8.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
7 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:64.5%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:72.8%(+8.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:64.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:72.8%(+8.3%)
Providers:1