+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 5.3% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is a language model developed by IBM. The model shows competitive results across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AttaQ (86.1%), HumanEval (82.4%), HumanEval+ (78.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
27 days newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:29.8%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:35.1%(+5.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:29.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:35.1%(+5.3%)
Providers:6