+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads with 20.5% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Overall, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is a language model developed by IBM. The model shows competitive results across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AttaQ (86.1%), HumanEval (82.4%), HumanEval+ (78.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. The model shows competitive results across 6 benchmarks. Notable strengths include AIME 2024 (73.6%), GPQA (70.8%), AIME 2025 (64.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:38.1%(+20.5%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:17.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
0 providers
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:38.1%(+20.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:17.5%
Providers:0