+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads with 14.5% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is a language model developed by IBM. The model shows competitive results across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AttaQ (86.1%), HumanEval (82.4%), HumanEval+ (78.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
18 days newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:36.1%(+14.5%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:21.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:36.1%(+14.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:21.6%
Providers:0