+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base leads with 20.6% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
1 month newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:60.4%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:81.0%(+20.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
1 providers
Mistral AI
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:60.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:81.0%(+20.6%)
Providers:1