+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-1.5 vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 22.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-1.5 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (90.0%), DocVQA (85.6%), MMLU (81.3%). Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.3% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (92.3%), DocVQA (90.1%), MGSM (86.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Grok-1.5
xAI
2024-03-28
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
Average Score:35.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:57.9%(+22.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
5 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
Avg Score:35.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:57.9%(+22.0%)
Providers:5