+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-1.5 vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 16.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-1.5 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (90.0%), DocVQA (85.6%), MMLU (81.3%). Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Grok-1.5
xAI
2024-03-28
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
Average Score:41.1%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:57.7%(+16.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
Avg Score:41.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:57.7%(+16.6%)
Providers:6