+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-1.5V vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct leads with 1.7% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 1.5V was introduced as a vision-enabled variant of Grok 1.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend Grok's capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual question answering and image analysis alongside textual understanding.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
5 months newer
Grok-1.5V
xAI
2024-04-12
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Average Score:71.3%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:73.0%(+1.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
6 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Avg Score:71.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:73.0%(+1.7%)
Providers:6