+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-1.5V vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 40.2% higher average benchmark score. Grok-1.5V supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-1.5V is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (88.3%), DocVQA (85.6%), TextVQA (78.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Grok-1.5V
xAI
2024-04-12
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Average performance across 38 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Average Score:13.2%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:53.5%(+40.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Avg Score:13.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:53.5%(+40.2%)
Providers:0