+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-1.5V vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads with 12.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 1.5V was introduced as a vision-enabled variant of Grok 1.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend Grok's capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual question answering and image analysis alongside textual understanding.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
10 months newer
Grok-1.5V
xAI
2024-04-12
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Average Score:69.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:82.4%(+12.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Avg Score:69.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:82.4%(+12.8%)
Providers:0