+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 mini vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 34.2% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-2 mini is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.2%), MMLU (86.2%), HumanEval (85.7%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
21 days newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:26.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:61.1%(+34.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:26.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:61.1%(+34.2%)
Providers:9