+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 mini vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 mini leads with 18.5% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Grok-2 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
21 days newer
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:73.7%(+18.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Average Score:55.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:73.7%(+18.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Avg Score:55.2%
Providers:9