+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 mini vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 mini leads with 22.0% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
1 month newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:70.1%(+22.0%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:48.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:70.1%(+22.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:48.1%
Providers:1