+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 mini vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 mini leads with 9.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-2 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
7 months newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:68.1%(+9.6%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:58.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
1 providers
Mistral AI
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:68.1%(+9.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:58.5%
Providers:1