+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 mini vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 12.8% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
4 months newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:71.2%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:84.0%(+12.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:71.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:84.0%(+12.8%)
Providers:2