+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 mini vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-mini leads with 4.9% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. o1-mini is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
1 month newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:74.3%
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:79.2%(+4.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
2 providers
Azure
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:74.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:79.2%(+4.9%)
Providers:2