+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 mini vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 mini leads with 22.0% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Mini was developed by Microsoft as a small language model designed to deliver impressive performance despite its compact size. Built with efficiency in mind, it demonstrates that capable language understanding and generation can be achieved with fewer parameters, making AI more accessible for edge and resource-constrained deployments.
10 days newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:73.6%(+22.0%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Average Score:51.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
1 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:73.6%(+22.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Avg Score:51.6%
Providers:1