+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 mini vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 16.6% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-2 mini is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.2%), MMLU (86.2%), HumanEval (85.7%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:37.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:53.6%(+16.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:37.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:53.6%(+16.6%)
Providers:1