+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 mini vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
8 months newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:51.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:52.0%(+1.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:51.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:52.0%(+1.0%)
Providers:0