+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 9.7% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 388.3K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Kimi K2 0905 is $8.90 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
1 year newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50($8.90 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:76.7%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:86.4%(+9.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:76.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:86.4%(+9.7%)
Providers:2