+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 8.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct offers 120.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $11.60 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
21 days newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($11.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:76.8%(+8.8%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:76.8%(+8.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:9