+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 1.9% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
7 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:56.0%(+1.9%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:54.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:56.0%(+1.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:54.1%
Providers:0