+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 25.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers 120.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $11.97 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
1 month newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($11.97 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:73.2%(+25.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:48.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:73.2%(+25.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:48.1%
Providers:1