+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 6.7% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct offers 120.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $11.25 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
1 month newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40($11.25 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:74.7%(+6.7%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:68.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:74.7%(+6.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:68.1%
Providers:5