+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 19.5% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct offers 120.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $11.70 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
26 days newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($11.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:87.5%(+19.5%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:87.5%(+19.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2