+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 12.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base offers 120.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is $11.60 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
7 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($11.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:71.3%(+12.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:58.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:71.3%(+12.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:58.5%
Providers:1