+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 6.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
7 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:74.9%(+6.5%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:68.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:74.9%(+6.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:68.4%
Providers:0