+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 18.5% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 MoE was created using a mixture-of-experts architecture, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency through sparse activation. Built to combine the benefits of larger models with practical computational requirements, it represents Microsoft's exploration of efficient scaling techniques.
10 days newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:76.7%(+18.5%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:58.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:76.7%(+18.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:58.2%
Providers:0