+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 21.5% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
5 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:73.8%(+21.5%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:52.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:73.8%(+21.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:52.3%
Providers:0