+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Kimi-k1.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 32.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Kimi-k1.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-3 Mini is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 87.8% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2024 (95.8%), AIME 2025 (90.8%), GPQA (84.0%). It supports a 136K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.7% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), CLUEWSC (91.4%), C-Eval (88.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
28 days newer
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:29.3%
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:61.3%(+32.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:29.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:61.3%(+32.0%)
Providers:0