+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 13.5% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B was developed as NVIDIA's largest Nemotron variant, designed to provide maximum capability through extensive customization of large-scale foundations. Built with 253 billion parameters and NVIDIA's specialized training, it represents the flagship offering in the Nemotron family.
1 month newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:85.1%(+13.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:71.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:85.1%(+13.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:71.6%
Providers:0