+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 51.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers 120.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $0.77 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
4 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($0.77 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:84.0%(+51.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:32.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:84.0%(+51.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:1