+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 37.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.9M more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
1 month newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($0.42 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:82.2%(+37.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:45.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:82.2%(+37.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:45.0%
Providers:6