+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 24.5% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small was created as an efficient reasoning-focused variant, designed to bring analytical capabilities to applications with tighter resource constraints. Built to balance problem-solving depth with practical deployment needs, it extends reasoning-enhanced AI to broader use cases.
3 months newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:87.8%(+24.5%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:63.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:87.8%(+24.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:63.2%
Providers:0