+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 38.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
28 days newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:84.0%(+38.0%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:46.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:84.0%(+38.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:46.0%
Providers:0