+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 39.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
4 months newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:84.0%(+39.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:44.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:84.0%(+39.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:44.2%
Providers:0