+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 16.0% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.8%), IFEval (90.3%), AIME 2025 (72.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
NVIDIA
2025-08-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:85.1%(+16.0%)
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Average Score:69.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
2024-09
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:85.1%(+16.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Avg Score:69.1%
Providers:0